Pictured are Cleveland Municipal Court Presiding and Administrative Judge Ron Adrine (in robe), Cleveland Municipal Court Judge Angela Stokes (in robe), Cleveland Ward 6 Councilwoman Mamie Mitchell (Black woman wearing necklace), Ohio State Representative Bill Patmon (D-10) (in red tie), a former city councilman, Stokes Attorney Richard Alkire (in stripped tie), and Cuyahoga Country Court of Common Pleas Presiding and Administrative Judge Nancy Fuerst (Caucasian woman in blue attire and necklace)
By Kathy Wray Coleman, editor-in-chief.
Coleman is a 20-year investigative journalist who trained for 17 years at the Call and Post Newspaper, Ohio's Black press.
(www.clevelandurbannews.com) / (www.kathywraycolemanonlinenewsblog.com)
CLEVELAND, Ohio- A Cleveland Urban News.Com investigation reveals that Cleveland Municipal Court Presiding and Administrative Judge Ron Adrine had no authority whatsoever to involuntarily remove Cleveland Judge Angela Stokes from hearing criminal cases, a move he made to media hoopla on Friday afternoon, including the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Ohio's largest newspaper that did a Sunday headliner expose' on it by political reporter Mark Namik.
Adrine claims that his decision, effective Monday, was influenced by a motion to transfer cases from Stokes' courtroom filed by the Cuyahoga County Office of the Public Defender , a venue led by Chief Public Defender Robert L. Tobik , and a venue that data show s also plagued with unprecedented corruption against the majority Black indigent clients that it represents in state courts including municipal courts involving a serious offense such as first degree misdemeanors and DUI's. Most defendants lose, including in the general division of the 34-member Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas where felonies and other legal matters are heard, data show.
Namik reported that Tobik, who is White, contacted Adrine to get Stokes saying his office has filed a motion against Stokes substantiating the request, though the investigation shows that such motion cannot serve to remove her from hearing legally designated case loads, or otherwise.
Stokes said that she will fight the gesture and called it warrant-less and void of fundamental "due process."
THE OHIO SUPREME COURT HAS MADE IT CLEAR IN RULINGS THAT PER THE OHIO LAWYER'S PROFESSIONAL CODE OF RESPONSIBILITY AND CASE LAW ONLY IT CAN DISCIPLINE A JUDGE AND PRECLUDE A JUDGE FROM PRESIDING OVER CASES IN GENERAL, AND THE AUTHORITY TO INVOLUNTARILY REMOVE AN OHIO MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE UNDER STATE LAW. (Ohio Revised Code 2701.031) FROM HEARING A PARTICULAR CASE RESTS SOLELY WITH THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF GENERAL DIVISION COMMON PLEAS COURTS IN OHIO. AND IN STOKES' CASE THAT PERSON IS CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PRESIDING AND ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE NANCY FUERST, AND ONLY FOLLOWING THE FILING OF AN AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE OR DISQUALIFICATION THAT FUERST SUBSEQUENTLY DETERMINES SHOWS A JUDICIAL BIAS OR CONFLICT. AND WHILE FUERST CAN REASSIGN CASES BASED UPON THE GRANTING OF AN AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE SHE CANNOT, BY LAW, DISCIPLINE JUDGES, AND NEITHER CAN ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL JUDGE, THAT AUTHORITY AGAIN RESTING SOLELY AMONG THE JUSTICES OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A BAR COMPLAINT. (Editor's Note: Effective January 2014 Fuerst is no longer the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Administrative and Presiding judge. That position is currently held by Judge John Russo).